Ducati Rider caught @ 200kph keeps bike

RobbieT

Elite Member
From Ducati.net

"Man who rode his Ducati faster than 200 kilometres per hour gets to keep his motorcycle

A Supreme Court judge has refused the province's attempt to seize ownership of a 2008 Ducati motorcycle clocked at more than 200 kilometres per hour in a 60 kph zone.

The B.C. director of civil forfeiture sought a court order, which was successfully challenged by Jason Alan Dery.

According to the ruling by Justice Gregory Bowden, Dery has 39 motor-vehicle offences since 1990, including five 24-hour suspensions.

On July 2, 2011, he was riding his Ducati 1098 motorcycle at 163 kph along Willis Point Road outside of Victoria before accelerating to more than 200 kph
."

More of the story is here:-
http://www.straight.com/news/421071/man-who-rode-his-ducati-faster-200-kilometres-hour-gets-keep-his-motorcycle

BUT my favorite exctract is...

"The uncontradicted evidence of the defendant is that the road where he accelerated to about 200 kph was long and straight; the weather was sunny and clear with good visibility; the road surface was dry; there were no other vehicles on the road or in sight; there were no pedestrians on the road or in sight; and the Ducati was in perfect working conditions with brakes and tires that had recently been replaced. The evidence does not satisfy me that the speeding by the defendant on July 2, 2011, amounted to dangerous driving under s. 249 of the Criminal Code. No evidence was presented to establish that speeding, in and by itself, is likely to cause serious bodily harm to a person."
 
39 previous, sounds like the guy is a Prick, Ducati or no.

I get what you are saying, am neither gonna agree or disagree, dont' know enough about the situation.

The point I was hoping to emphasise was the judg'es comments about the relationship between speed and danger, or more impotantly his different aproach to go away from the usual mantra that loads of folk simply assume fast=dangerous.
:)
 
Last edited:
I've had a chat with a few off duty traffic cops, one of my mates has done the bike safe course, he is an instructor, advanced rider and they have all said individually, "national speed limit signs, ride to the conditions" this doesn't mean 60mph in a dim overcast evening even although it technically isn't illegal. So it works both ways !
Anyone care to test out the theory and report back ?
 
I was sympathetic about this when telling my better half but on checking the numbers 60Kmh = 37mph while 200k = 124mph...

or over THREE times the speed limit, hard to comment really without more specifics but the track might be a better place for such 'episodes'.
 
On a unrelated subject, has anyone noticed the amount of "road safety camera" about just now.

On Thursday going up to Aberdeen, there was 3 between Dundee and Aberdeen in addition to a hairdryer and a number of unmarked cars
 
They're all fuckers, they go on about how good their driving is which isn't true, find out how many they kill in a year while on patrol and speeding to an incident. True story I know a polis who passed her police test driving from the collage at Kincardine to the chip shop and back.

Speeding is blamed too much. It's usually another fault. Remember the government is skint and needs money.
 
I don't think you can blame the police for speeding policy - they just get told to enforce the mad thoughts of the politicians and senior police officers.

As younger man, I had quite a few (justified :o) stops for speeding and in over 50% of the cases I was just given a warning and sent on my way. There is a time and place for everything and unfortunately, camera vans don't have the same ability to reason. I am seeing far too many vans on NSL roads and motorways and not any outside of schools, hospitals and residential areas.

As for the Australian rider: what was the matter... couldn't find 5th?! ;)
 
I was sympathetic about this when telling my better half but on checking the numbers 60Kmh = 37mph while 200k = 124mph...
or over THREE times the speed limit, hard to comment really without more specifics but the track might be a better place for such 'episodes'.

thats kinda my point......and others have hinted at this in their posts (with or without realising it).....

would it have been so bad if he was 10kph, 20kph, 30kph, 40kph, 50kph, twice, or even four times over the limit? as Beepee mentioned...its maybe all about the circumstances/conditions not the imposed limits?

Perhaps trackdays might be better for these episodes... :dunno: ....but then again how many tracks (in the uk) can you actually reach anywhere near the bikes top speed?

I will admit to doing 255kpm (about 160mph) on a public roads/motorways
on the autobahn in Germany
and i felt safer then than doing 20 or 30mph on some inner city/town routes, and also even then A LOT safer than at certain points on some of the trackdays Ive done!

will stand back now and await any critical responses!
 
thats kinda my point......and others have hinted at this in their posts (with or without realising it).....

would it have been so bad if he was 10kph, 20kph, 30kph, 40kph, 50kph, twice, or even four times over the limit? as Beepee mentioned...its maybe all about the circumstances/conditions not the imposed limits?

Perhaps trackdays might be better for these episodes... :dunno: ....but then again how many tracks (in the uk) can you actually reach anywhere near the bikes top speed?

I will admit to doing 255kpm (about 160mph) on a public roads/motorways
on the autobahn in Germany
and i felt safer then than doing 20 or 30mph on some inner city/town routes, and also even then A LOT safer than at certain points on some of the trackdays Ive done!

will stand back now and await any critical responses!

Did you have any clothes left in your bag ? :)
 
Back
Top Bottom