Problem with fast track is, you’re just sat on the plane longer waiting for everyone else.
Better to turn up last minute ?
Conspiracy theories, who starts them and why?
- Thread starter West Cork Paul
- Start date
Better to turn up last minute ?
Problem with crimeair and the likes is now no carry on luggage but with fast track you get an allocated seat and a wheeley case so all my European flights last year had virtually nobody in the non fast track Q
And people paying extra(?) to take all their luggage in the cabin so they don’t have to wait the other end. Then we all have to wait an extra half an hour while the cabin crew try and fit all the luggage in the overhead.
Anyway, back to conspiracy theories.
British Airways. Hey.
Wankers.
British Airways. Hey.
Wankers.
I'm in no rushHow long ya gonna wait.
If they crash do you get another plane like yo udo with Halfords?That’s what happens when you fly Halfords, should have gone SnapOn Airways.
Do you get a discount with my Halfords card??
Yes, but you have to wait for when the van turns up next.
AirCon
Resident Thermodynamics / Electronics specialist
It doesn't matter, they are getting in behind you.....
So you were setting up a false equivalency analogy. OKYes. They’re a wise precaution for most inner city environments these days.
Anyway, I was referring to vaccine passports to travel not go to a concert or pub.
Im still trying to work out your anagram
Oh. And
You leave my nan and gran alone, you Western perv.
Elon Musk's Neuralink could soon implant its brain chip in HUMANS
Neuralink posted a job listing for a clinical trial director who will 'work with Neuralink's first Clinical Trial participants.' This suggests the company will soon implant its brain chips in humans.
5-4-3-2-1-GO
Canadian Parliament DIDN’T LIKE THIS QUESTION! #WEF / Hugo Talk | The Truthseeker
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk
For a chuckle I've just turned RT to see their view of Ukraine as it's always worth a different view and their banner is also promoting the canadian government as an authoritarian government. I'm sure the irony is not lost even if some ignore the coincidental timing.
Who:Attention seekers
Why: To get attention
Non-empirical truth is a matter of perspective.
The Douglas et al. paper continues:
As incredible as this may be, as far as these academics and researchers are concerned, unless the conspiracy is officially acknowledged by the “appropriate experts”, it remains a “secret” and therefore cannot be known. We are being sold the line that conspiracies only come into existence once they have been officially admitted.
And;
"In this light, Anni Sternisko’s statement at last reveals something about what the BBC called the “risk” of conspiracy theory. It seems that these alternative explanations of events are not dangerous to the conspiracy theorists themselves, but rather to people like Sternisko, who find them “frightening”.
Questioning power is a fundamental democratic ideal, yet this PhD candidate would appear to be one of millions in Western societies who have come to feel that doing so is scary. Fear, and the resultant stress and anxiety it produces, can be very damaging to our mental health. So the BBC is right, in a sense, to highlight potential risks in this domain.
It is just that the BBC, and the groundless psychological theories it promotes, are wrong about who is at risk. It isn’t the purported “conspiracy theorists”, but rather the people who unquestioningly accept official accounts who are “vulnerable”.
What the BBC presented with its REEL segment was not an exploration of the psychology behind conspiracy theory. It was instead an exposé of the deep-rooted terror of those who apparently dare not look at the evidence cited by the people they label “conspiracy theorists”.
If their government is lying to them, then, for some reason, it seems they do not want to know. The mere thought of it petrifies them."
Source: The BBC's Psychology Behind Conspiracy Theories
As incredible as this may be, as far as these academics and researchers are concerned, unless the conspiracy is officially acknowledged by the “appropriate experts”, it remains a “secret” and therefore cannot be known. We are being sold the line that conspiracies only come into existence once they have been officially admitted.
And;
"In this light, Anni Sternisko’s statement at last reveals something about what the BBC called the “risk” of conspiracy theory. It seems that these alternative explanations of events are not dangerous to the conspiracy theorists themselves, but rather to people like Sternisko, who find them “frightening”.
Questioning power is a fundamental democratic ideal, yet this PhD candidate would appear to be one of millions in Western societies who have come to feel that doing so is scary. Fear, and the resultant stress and anxiety it produces, can be very damaging to our mental health. So the BBC is right, in a sense, to highlight potential risks in this domain.
It is just that the BBC, and the groundless psychological theories it promotes, are wrong about who is at risk. It isn’t the purported “conspiracy theorists”, but rather the people who unquestioningly accept official accounts who are “vulnerable”.
What the BBC presented with its REEL segment was not an exploration of the psychology behind conspiracy theory. It was instead an exposé of the deep-rooted terror of those who apparently dare not look at the evidence cited by the people they label “conspiracy theorists”.
If their government is lying to them, then, for some reason, it seems they do not want to know. The mere thought of it petrifies them."
Source: The BBC's Psychology Behind Conspiracy Theories
Mags PressUN Declares War on ‘Dangerous’ Conspiracy Theories: ‘The World Is NOT Secretly Manipulated By Global Elite’
The United Nations has declared war on conspiracy theories, describing the rise of conspiracy thinking as “worrying and dangerous”, and providing the public with a toolkit to “prebunk” and “debunk”…
magspress.com
Alex Jones ordered to pay Sandy Hook parents more than $45M in punitive damages
Alex Jones has been ordered to pay more than $45 million in punitive damages to Sandy Hook parents, a jury ordered Friday.
AirCon
Resident Thermodynamics / Electronics specialist
Feeble minded persons love this shite.. it means they don't have to reflect on their life decisions and can blame others for misfortune they have caused loved ones or themselves. ... those that make money from misinformation should be punished.
Like Pfizer .. your not helping share prices
He didn’t have the boosters, he should be struck off the Board
So you didn't read it then....(or you wouldn't have written what you just did, would you). Typical.
Agree - in fact those who spread misinformation that effects the general population should do time.
AirCon
Resident Thermodynamics / Electronics specialist
Shares are doing fine.
Nothing to see regarding Pfizer... only in certain peoples heads.
Why was the "conspiracy theory" myth created?
If you thought you knew what facts and evidence are, the UN, the EU, Twitter and the World Jewish Congress have news for you.
www.ukcolumn.org