Quotations

Rupert Lowe:-

Walk around any British town centre. It's filthy, plagued with gangs of foreign men shouting in their own languages, harassing local women. I am sick of it. I have had enough. We have all had enough.

Why do we put up with it? What are they doing here? Why is nobody in politics talking about it? They'll all scream 'oh isn't Rupert a racist?!' I honestly don't give a shit. I really don't.

It's all true, and we all know it.

Britain didn't used to be like this. Ten, twenty, thirty years ago - it did not used to be like this. We've all seen how it's changed.
It does not have to be like this.

I remember working and living in London. It was the best city in the world. Vibrant, fun, safe, exciting, welcoming.
Now? Large parts are becoming a squalid slum - like so many of our towns and cities. Not just London, Birmingham or Manchester. But our once-charming little towns are going the same way, many already have. Others are well on their way...

Importing hundreds of thousands of young men from backward cultures that share none of our values - that hate women, disrespect women, mistreat women.

What did we think would happen, honestly? Is it a surprise that same poison is infecting our streets and communities? No. No, it is not.

These changes to our communities and our towns are not permanent, not irremediable, not inevitable.

It can be reversed. And it must be reversed.

Stop the flow. Deport the illegals. Remove those foreigners who add nothing, but take so very much.

I will continue to make these arguments in Westminster.

Starmer's too weak to say it, Farage is too scared to say it.

But it's time politicians were honest with the British people.

I have had enough. I want to live in a country where women can enjoy a Friday night out without the fear of being raped by somebody who should never have been in our country to begin with.

I want my country back.
 
1762597819940.webp
 
Oddly enough, who says what is often a decent shortcut for analysing and dissecting their arguments, and for recognising propaganda if you are not equipped (or lack the time) to recognise & decipher it yourself.

For example, how much of your life should you spend listening to Diane Butler and addressing her utterances? Or Kier Starmer? Or Ed Davey? Or Kemi Badenoch?

"Consider the Source" is not a panacea but it often helps you determine whether you are in a good-faith or bad-faith discussion.
 
Oddly enough, who says what is often a decent shortcut for analysing and dissecting their arguments, and for recognising propaganda if you are not equipped (or lack the time) to recognise & decipher it yourself.

For example, how much of your life should you spend listening to Diane Butler and addressing her utterances? Or Kier Starmer? Or Ed Davey? Or Kemi Badenoch?

"Consider the Source" is not a panacea but it often helps you determine whether you are in a good-faith or bad-faith discussion.

I'm looking at you Loz...did you say something? :unsure:
 
Oddly enough, who says what is often a decent shortcut for analysing and dissecting their arguments, and for recognising propaganda if you are not equipped (or lack the time) to recognise & decipher it yourself.

For example, how much of your life should you spend listening to Diane Butler and addressing her utterances? Or Kier Starmer? Or Ed Davey? Or Kemi Badenoch?

"Consider the Source" is not a panacea but it often helps you determine whether you are in a good-faith or bad-faith discussion.
Also look at why they're saying it and when.
If they're suddenly taking an interest in a topic they've ignored for years because someone with a higher public profile/poll rating has just raised it, you know beyond doubt that they're full of shit.
 
The hilarious result of all this is that people who used to think that Shooter's cameo in the film version of Glengarry Glen Ross represents his best acting performance... now realise that he wasn't actually acting at all.

Not seen it...
 
Not seen it...
It's a tedious grind, to be honest. I'm almost tempted to re-watch it with my wide-awake eyes now, to search for signs of fun psyop stuff. However, I might just use Grok to ask the question, "Does the film Glengarry Glen Ross feature a urinal/urination scene?" This is a cheat-code for quickly determining whether a film is woke/propaganda.

Edit: No urination scene as such, per Grok but it is a 1992 film and thus pre-dates by a few years Hollywoodland's overwhelming obsession with depicting men going for a piss.
 
Back
Top Bottom